Adiabatic temperature profile in the mantle - Re-evaluation of T at D410


How can we have a fixed T?

  • A simple way : T at the seismic discontinuity
    • by comparing the discontinuity depth with the transition pressure
      • This is a quite old idea, but…
  • However, is the discontinuity depth a simple function of T?
    • Effect of water and iron content  on the phase relations

Phase diagram of Ol-Wd transition

  • Phase diagram of the Ol-Wd transition by Katsura et al. [2004a]
    • Calculate P using the MgO scale proposed by Matsui et al. [2000]
      • Recently new pressure scales were proposed
      • P calculation by Katsura et al. [2004a] using Matsui scale had insufficient precision
  • Recalc. of the trans. P by
    • Two new P scales prop. by Tange et al. [2009].
      • Reproduce recent exp. data
      • 2 EoS’s
        • 3rd-order B-M EoS
        • Vinet EoS
      • More precise program for the Matsui scale
    • The recalc. trans. P are 0.35~0.65 GPa lower than Katsura et al. [2004]
    • Matsui (rev) > Tange-V > Tange-3BM
      • Difference of each:  0.15 GPa

Pressure Scale

 

Matsui et al. [2000]

 

Tange et al. [2009]

(Vinet EOS)

Tange et al. [2009]

(3rd BM EOS)

Mg2SiO4 1900 K

 

15.00 GPa

 

14.85 GPa

 

14.70 GPa

Mg2SiO4 1600 K

 

13.85 GPa

 

13.75 GPa

 

13.60 GPa


Temperature at D410

  • Assuming
    • Mg# = 89  & No effect of water
    • Reflect. plane : Ol : Wd ratio is 1:2 [Stixrude, 1997]
  • The depth of D410 at 1900 and 1600 K :
      • 421 & 389 km (Matsui)
      • 416 & 385 km (Tange-V)
      • 412 & 382 km (Tange-3BM)
    • D410 shift with T at a rate of 0.1 km/K.
  • Average depth of D410
  • Temperature at D410 : 1830+-40 K